Know What You're Training For
In light of recent discussions I thought this article I found on "Black Belt" Magazines site was relevent. Enjoy!
Know What You’re Training For
by David Hallford
Law-enforcement officers know what they’re training for. Military personnel know what they’re training for. If you’re not in one of those groups, you’re almost certainly a civilian. Do you know what you’re training for?
Black Belt regularly runs articles about the proper use of force and how not adhering to the rules in certain situations can land you in jail or on the receiving end of a civil lawsuit. Every bit as important as knowing the appropriate level of force for a given situation is knowing what you’re training for.
Unlike members of law-enforcement agencies or military units, a civilian has a completely different agenda when facing an armed opponent. Your priority is to survive and escape. The instant an opportunity presents itself, you should take it and safely get as far away from the danger as you can.
Running from a threat is not an automatic reaction for most people. Someone with no training will typically freeze in the face of danger. On the other hand, a person trained in the martial arts may freeze, just like an untrained person, or see it as an opportunity to use his skills. His ego keeps him from doing the proper thing, which is fleeing.
The key to running away is doing it safely. It might not be safe to do so until you’ve disarmed or disabled the aggressor. It’s at this point that you might wish you’d paid more attention to your surroundings or listened to that little voice inside you that was saying something’s not right.
Law enforcement doesn’t have the luxury of running or escaping, unless it’s to call for backup and proceed once support has arrived. They have a duty to protect the innocent and arrest law breakers. When faced with an armed assailant, they’re generally authorized to use lethal force. If they’re able to do so, they will. If not, they may have to resort to unarmed tactics. Their first priority is to survive, and they might have to employ lethal force to do so. If so, the event is over. If not, they must then control and arrest the assailant. That’s how they’re trained.
The military operates under what are referred to as “rules of engagement,” which generally mandate that soldiers can eliminate enemy combatants who present a threat, especially an armed threat. They can’t afford to leave them in a state in which they can mount another attack, nor do they have the means to arrest and detain the enemy in most situations. Members of the military usually don’t hesitate to carry out their tasks. That’s how they’re trained.
Clarity in training facilitates clarity in action. It’s up to martial arts instructors to delineate these differences to their students, and it’s up to students to become knowledgeable enough to seek out an instructor who knows the differences.
When faced with an armed aggressor, lethal force is generally warranted if it’s required for the defender’s survival. If the appropriate action can be accomplished without employing lethal force (in non-military confrontations), so much the better.
To recap, the recipe for action against an armed opponent is as follows: If you’re a civilian, your goal is to escape. If you’re in law enforcement, your goal is probably to arrest. If you’re in the military, your goal is usually to eliminate.
About the author: David Hallford is a multiple black-belt holder with more than 25 years of experience. He has devoted 13 years to studying violent crime and developing realistic self-defense tactics. For more information, visit http://www.blackbeltmag.com and click on Community, then Black Belt Authors.
"It is sobering to reflect that one of the best ways to get yourself a reputation as a dangerous citizen these days is to go about repeating the very phrases which our founding fathers used in the struggle for independence." – Charles A. Beard