Results 1 to 1 of 1

Thread: Dismal Truths of Police Use-of-Force Training

  1. #1
    Doc's Avatar
    Doc
    Doc is offline
    AKI Contributing Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Posts
    8,364
    Thanks
    4,244
    Thanked 14,836 Times in 5,532 Posts

    Default Dismal Truths of Police Use-of-Force Training

    New survey reveals dismal truths of Police use-of-force training

    Force Science Institute

    Dr. Bill Lewinski often notes in his public presentations that the average high school football player gets more training in his sport in his brief career than the average peace officer receives in use-of-force instruction across his or her entire working life.
    Now a first-of-its-kind survey by Calibre Press has confirmed that dismal truth.


    Recently, Calibre editors invited readers of its popular "Street Survival" newsletter to complete an anonymous Survey Monkey poll regarding their departmental training policies. Nearly 900 officers from small agencies to large participated, with these results:

    Range time.
    Nearly two-thirds of officers said they are required by policy to shoot on the range with their sidearm only once (23.66%) or twice (37.66%) a year. Only about 8% have to shoot as often as monthly.

    Qualification.
    Monthly official qualification with their sidearm is required for only 1.37%, while roughly 84% need to qualify only annually (46.81%) or semi-annually (37.24%).

    Scenarios.
    The monthly requirement shrinks even more (to 0.91%) when it comes to "dynamic 'shoot/don't shoot' scenario-type training." One-quarter never have to experience such training, and over half (56.26%) do so only once a year or less often.

    DT training.
    Close to 15% of officers said they are never required by policy to do "defensive/control tactics-type training." For two-thirds (63.82%), such training is mandated only once a year (42.32%) or less (21.5%). Fewer than 2% must train hands-on monthly.

    Less-lethal.
    Monthly requirement virtually fades off the chart (at 0.57%) when it comes to training with "less-than-lethal weapons" such as TASERS, batons, and OC spray. Annual training predominates at over 55%. One in five officers trains less frequently than that, and over 10% never have to engage in this type of training.

    ---

    For those who think cops are ninja warriors who should have no trouble slapping the cuffs on some guy fighting you without hurting him, or wonder why cops don't shoot more guns out of peoples hands, this survey should clear that up for you. With the exception of specialized units, civilian police are woefully under trained, and nobody wants to pay for the training they really need.
    Last edited by Doc; 06-01-2016 at 07:11 AM.
    "Nothing is more dangerous than the conscientiously ignorant, or the sincerely stupid." - Martin Luther King Jr.

    "Knowledge speaks but wisdom listens." - Ed Parker Sr.

    "It's much easier to quote, than to know." - Ron Chapél


    www.MSUACF.com

  2. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Doc For This Useful Post:

    jdinca (06-01-2016),KirkS (06-01-2016),nelson (06-01-2016)

Remove Ads

Sponsored Links

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Chinese police self defense
    By punisher73 in forum Law Enforcement
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 12-06-2012, 01:11 PM
  2. Police kenpo vid
    By nelson in forum Law Enforcement
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 08-10-2012, 12:01 PM
  3. Police Fatalaties Jump
    By nelson in forum General Martial Arts
    Replies: 24
    Last Post: 01-01-2011, 02:34 AM
  4. Police Humor
    By Bob Hubbard in forum Humor
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 10-02-2009, 03:56 PM
  5. Can you count on the police....
    By Celtic_Crippler in forum General Discussion
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 12-01-2006, 08:21 PM