When discussing kicks there is a saying that must not be forgoten.
You can snap a thrust kick, but you can not thrust a snap kick.
Think about it.
These are the kicks listed as 'Basics' in the studio where I study. Submitted for discussion.
Front Snap
Side Snap
Back Snap
Roundhouse
Front Knee
Front Stomp
Back Stomp
Side Stomp
Shuffle (Drag) Kick
Front Thrust
Side Thrust
Back Thrust
Front Scoop
Back Scoop
Spinning Back
Side Chicken
Front Chicken
Front Cross Side Stomp
Rear Cross Side Stomp
Front Roundhouse Sweep
Reverse Roundhouse Sweep
Spinning Crescent
KenpoTalk |
Adv. Blue Belt |
When discussing kicks there is a saying that must not be forgoten.
You can snap a thrust kick, but you can not thrust a snap kick.
Think about it.
Holding onto anger is like grasping a hot coal with the intent of throwing it at someone else; you are the one who gets burned. - Buddha
OK LOL I will think about this... maybe I need to hear your definition of thrust and snap.Originally Posted by dubljay
How about we add knife edge kick to the list - we use those in lots of techniques...
Also, Michael can you please describe a side chicken kick? I've seen/done front and back chicken kicks, but I'm not sure of how you execute a side chicken kick.
KenpoTalk |
Adv. Blue Belt |
A side chicken is also referred to as a butterfly kick as well. The best example I can think of is in Long 4, Prance of the Tiger. From the cat stance you execute a thrusting sweep kick, then with the opposite foot you execute a snapping side kick. The timing is the same as a chicken kick, just done with a side kick instead.
The difference between a thrust kick and a snap kick lies entirely upon the body mechanics used in the kick. A snap kick utilizes only the muscles of the leg for the strike, where as a thrust kick utilizes the hips as well. The simplest example would be the difference between a snapping ball kick (aka front snap kick) and a thrusting ball kick (aka front thrust kick). The weapon used to deliver the strikes is the same, the ball of the foot. The kicks look really similar with one difference that can go unnoticed. A snapping ball kick is characteristically faster than a thrust kick, though not as powerful. When executed from your rear leg the knee comes up, you extend you foot to the target, retract your foot and then replant. A thrust kick follows the same path, however there is an added "push" from the hips extending the range just a bit and adding more power. I find this difficult to explain, one way of relating them would be comparing a jab to a reverse punch, though that is a sloppy comparison.
So the snapping action of striking your target and immediately retracting your foot can be done on both a snap kick and a thrust kick. However due to limitations of body mechanics you cannot (usually cannot) deliver a thrust kick unless you set up the body mechanics (usually a shift or pivot in the hips).
Last edited by dubljay; 02-16-2005 at 02:28 PM.
Holding onto anger is like grasping a hot coal with the intent of throwing it at someone else; you are the one who gets burned. - Buddha
I see it in Long Four thanks!Originally Posted by dubljay
OK I think I can relate to this in terms of a thrusting side kick where I actually push through with my hip but also pivot my supporting foot a bit to close critical distance and push through my target. In a thrusting front snap kick, other than possibly dropping your weight, does your supporting leg move at all during this kick? Also how does it, or does it affect your upper body?The difference between a thrust kick and a snap kick lies entirely upon the body mechanics used in the kick. A snap kick utilizes only the muscles of the leg for the strike, where as a thrust kick utilizes the hips as well. The simplest example would be the difference between a snapping ball kick (aka front snap kick) and a thrusting ball kick (aka front thrust kick). The weapon used to deliver the strikes is the same, the ball of the foot. The kicks look really similar with one difference that can go unnoticed. A snapping ball kick is characteristically faster than a thrust kick, though not as powerful. When executed from your rear leg the knee comes up, you extend you foot to the target, retract your foot and then replant. A thrust kick follows the same path, however there is an added "push" from the hips extending the range just a bit and adding more power. I find this difficult to explain, one way of relating them would be comparing a jab to a reverse punch, though that is a sloppy comparison.
So the snapping action of striking your target and immediately retracting your foot can be done on both a snap kick and a thrust kick. However due to limitations of body mechanics you cannot (usually cannot) deliver a thrust kick unless you set up the body mechanics (usually a shift or pivot in the hips).
MJ![]()
KenpoTalk |
Adv. Blue Belt |
I am not sure how much the difference would effect the upper body. Perhaps because a thrust kick has more momentum than a snap kick, the upper body extends out in the opposite direction a bit more to act as a counter ballance. Good question I am going to play around with the differences to see if I can see anything.Originally Posted by mjhiya
-Josh-
Holding onto anger is like grasping a hot coal with the intent of throwing it at someone else; you are the one who gets burned. - Buddha
Thanks Josh! I'll be out of town for a few days but I'll check back next week! One more thought on this...your weapon is the same for both kicks, would/could you use the thrust kick on the same targets, or would it be more for pushing through say on a body shot?Originally Posted by dubljay
MJ![]()
KenpoTalk |
Adv. Blue Belt |
I think it would be equally effective on both targets. However some targets do not require the power of a thrust kick to get the desired reaction. For example, a ball kick the groin. In this situation the target is the front of the groin so the kick will bend the opponent forward. (think of Thrusting Salute and Buckling Branch from the Orange list note the differences in the front kicks and the opponents reaction). A snap kick would be just as effective at getting your opponent to bend forward as a thrust kick, so a thrust kick would be waisted energy and motion.Originally Posted by mjhiya
Also if you look at a knife edge side kick. I would NEVER use the knife edge of my foot in a side thrust kick... the likely result would be broken foot or ankle depending on the target.
Holding onto anger is like grasping a hot coal with the intent of throwing it at someone else; you are the one who gets burned. - Buddha
Good thoughts on the thrust kick and I agree I would push through the heel on the side thrusting kick over a knife edge. One thought, a little diversion on the snap kick to the groin...we've played with the idea that the vitals (sensitive parts of the groin) are actually located more underneath than in front, so a more effective groin shot may be an instep kick to the groin - also this kick gives you a path rather than a line to follow reducing the margin for error on that target.Originally Posted by dubljay
KenpoTalk |
Adv. Blue Belt |
Very true, however it will yield a completely different *initial* reaction.Originally Posted by mjhiya
Holding onto anger is like grasping a hot coal with the intent of throwing it at someone else; you are the one who gets burned. - Buddha
I'm sure you are right, but no one at my studio will actually allow me to find the answer to that.Originally Posted by dubljay
That being - what is the initial reaction to an instep kick to the groin?
KenpoTalk |
Adv. Blue Belt |
The initial reaction to an instep strike to the groin would be your opponent lifting up (up on to his toes for exaggeration). This is due to the upward motion of the strike. This is used in Buckling Branch because your next move is to collapse his knee. (I used Initial because it is more or less involuntary. instinctualy any guy would drop to the ground and curl up into the fetal position and wish they had been shot in the head) You lift him up to slam him back down to the ground. Where in Thrusting Salute you strike the front of the groin to bring his face into your thrusting heal palm to his chin (borrowed force).
Holding onto anger is like grasping a hot coal with the intent of throwing it at someone else; you are the one who gets burned. - Buddha
Good examples, and at the very least they would then instinctually grab their groin. I like your initial = involuntary analogy it makes more sense that way, thanks.Originally Posted by dubljay
![]()
KenpoTalk |
Adv. Blue Belt |
I did not really understand the concept all that well myself until my instructor enlightened me. In the time it takes for you to re-chamber your in-step front kick to deliver the knife edge side kick in Buckling Branch, the opponent (myself when I was being "enlightened") is still reacting from the strike to the groin, and the first reaction to being hit anywhere is to move away from it (generally speaking in the same direction as the strike travels). Believe me despite having protection I was up on my toes when I recieved the kick to the back of my knee.![]()
Holding onto anger is like grasping a hot coal with the intent of throwing it at someone else; you are the one who gets burned. - Buddha
Feeling is believing! You seem like a good student too!Originally Posted by dubljay
![]()
KenpoTalk |
Adv. Blue Belt |
Feeling is believing... no question in my mind. As for a good student... eh I could do more.Originally Posted by mjhiya
Holding onto anger is like grasping a hot coal with the intent of throwing it at someone else; you are the one who gets burned. - Buddha
I have so been in your shoes...well, not literally, but...well...you know what I mean.Originally Posted by dubljay
![]()
See, all I've gotta do is get loose like I'm fluid, dude, Rollin' up my sleeves on my gi and get into it. You and who, him and them? Line up in a single file. One on one, all for one...end up in a bigger pile. The ambiance of Martial Arts is constant, Nunchucks chuckin' when I step in the mosh pit. Wing Chun dummy getting splintered apart, Escrima sticks whippin' and I'm chipping the bark. What are you? A pink belt? I'll give you a head start. Kumite killin', with the spirit of Ed Parker.
KenpoTalk |
Adv. Blue Belt |
Many times, while working with a partner, you can get a reasonable faxsimilie of a realisitic groin response by hitting them high up on the inner thigh, just below the testicles. This does not have the same pain response but creates a similiar psychological response. Most males, especially males in the 11 to 29 age bracket react automatically to any strike to the region regardless of whether it strikes the groin or not. There are, of course, exceptions. The ones most notably, are your masochists, and those that are proud of wearing their cups; however, if you hit them in the thigh, and they aren't expecting it, their body will react involuntarily. Try it, you may be surprised.
Just because you do something one way, does not mean that everyone else does it that way, or that it is even the correct way.
And those that are sans testicles..![]()
definately don't wanna be sans those.
See, all I've gotta do is get loose like I'm fluid, dude, Rollin' up my sleeves on my gi and get into it. You and who, him and them? Line up in a single file. One on one, all for one...end up in a bigger pile. The ambiance of Martial Arts is constant, Nunchucks chuckin' when I step in the mosh pit. Wing Chun dummy getting splintered apart, Escrima sticks whippin' and I'm chipping the bark. What are you? A pink belt? I'll give you a head start. Kumite killin', with the spirit of Ed Parker.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)